Logo ADS-Training Home   All Libraries and Lists   Site Management   Create (reserved)   Site Help   
Icon
ADS-Training InfoCenter
Windows White Papers and Library
 
 
 
Select a View
All Items
Show comments and details
Complete list
 
 
Actions
  Alert me
  Export to spreadsheet
  Modify settings and columns
 
 
New New Item
|
Filter Filter
|
Edit in Datasheet Edit in Datasheet
 
Attachment
Title SSL/TLS in Windows Server 2003
Modified 12/28/2003 9:58 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Top IT Tasks
Body
The Microsoft® Windows Server™ 2003 operating system supports Schannel, an implementation of three protocols (TLS 1.0, SSL 3.0 & SSL 2.0) that provide network security for applications and services. This paper focuses on the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL 3.0) protocol and Transport Layer Security (TLS 1.0) protocol. These protocols offer certificate-based authentication and secure data transfers using symmetric encryption keys.
Title SSL/TLS in Windows Server 2003
 
Attachment
Title Windows Server 2003 and WMS Case Study
Modified 8/21/2003 9:05 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Architect; Plan; Deploy; Case Study
Body
This document explains the approach used to implement the Microsoft Windows Server 2003 embedded Windows Media Services solution to offer real-time video streaming to ETSI (the European Telecommunications Standards Institute)corporate users and external partners. This document presents strategic choices and related methodology to deploy the solution and take benefits of new performance, security, monitoring and logging features of the 9.0 version.
Title Windows Server 2003 and WMS Case Study

Attachment
Title Windows Server 2003 and WMS at ETSI by JF Aprea and JL Freisse
Modified 6/10/2006 1:21 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Case Study
Body
European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) doubled the frame rate display – from 15 frames per second to 30 frames per second – by upgrading to the Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition operating system and Windows Media Services 9 Series. The doubling of frame rates – which provides an appreciable benefit for viewers – was seen on the same hardware that had previously been running the Windows 2000 Server operating system and Windows Media Services 8.0. ETSI also gained tighter security measurements and easier system administration with its upgrade to Windows Server 2003.
Title Windows Server 2003 and WMS at ETSI by JF Aprea and JL Freisse
 
Attachment
Title Step-by-Step Guide for Setting Up IPv6 in a Test Lab
Modified 8/21/2003 9:55 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Architect; Plan; Deploy; Support
Body
This white paper describes how to configure Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) in a test lab using five computers. Of the five computers, one is a DNS server, two are clients, and two are routers. This white paper also includes an exercise that severs network connectivity between intranets and then uses Intra-Site Automatic Tunnel Addressing Protocol (ISATAP) to restore communication.
Title Step-by-Step Guide for Setting Up IPv6 in a Test Lab

Attachment
Title Windows Storage Server 2003: Meeting the Storage Challenges of Today's Businesses
Modified 8/27/2003 2:34 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Deploy; Case Study
Body
Businesses of all sizes are seeking cost effective storage management solutions that keep critical data protected and highly available. This white paper outlines the major storage challenges facing today's businesses, and shows how the integrated storage services in Microsoft Windows Server™ 2003 and Microsoft Windows Storage Server 2003 provide manageable, reliable, and cost effective solutions designed to meet those challenges.
 
Title Windows Storage Server 2003: Meeting the Storage Challenges of Today's Businesses
 
Title White Papers on Microsoft Windows Storage solutions
Modified 1/6/2004 3:56 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server
Categories Architect; Plan; Deploy
Body
Windows Powered NAS - White Papers are available on this web link:
 
Title White Papers on Microsoft Windows Storage solutions

Attachment
Title Windows Server 2003 Active Directory Fast Recovery with Volume Shadow Copy Service and Virtual Disk Service
Modified 8/27/2003 2:56 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Plan; Support; Top IT Tasks
Body
This whitepaper provides a fast recovery demonstration designed to enable system administrators to implement fast recovery solutions in their own Active Directory environments.
Title Windows Server 2003 Active Directory Fast Recovery with Volume Shadow Copy Service and Virtual Disk Service
 
Attachment
Title Automated Deployment Services Technical Overview
Modified 9/19/2003 12:35 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Architect; Plan; Deploy
Body
As both the rate of growth and the installed base of Microsoft® Windows Server™ operating systems increases, managing the deployment and administration of these systems becomes a significant driver of the overall cost of ownership.
Today automated operating system and application deployment technologies are typically script-based or rely on traditional imaging and deployment tools from third-party vendors. Script-based installation solutions provide flexibility across a wide range of hardware configurations but tend to be very slow, and few standard methodologies exist for them. Traditional imaging technologies, although much faster, are inflexible and require considerable effort to adapt and maintain an image collection over both hardware variations and time.
Script-based administration of a large number of Windows® servers traditionally has not been easy. Unlike in the UNIX environment, in which operators can use tools such as rsh, ssh, and rdist to perform remote administration on groups of servers, script-based administration in the Windows Server environment has required operators to deal with each server individually.
With Microsoft Windows Server 2003, Microsoft extends the platform to enable rapid, flexible deployment and seamless, script-based administration of a large number of Windows servers.
Title Automated Deployment Services Technical Overview

Attachment
Title Moving to Windows Server 2003
Modified 9/25/2003 8:29 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server
Categories Architect; Plan; Deploy
Body
by Dave Sayers, Senior Consultant at Windows Team - Microsoft Services Organisation
Title Moving to Windows Server 2003
 
Attachment
Title Linux vs Windows Server 2003: Giga Total Economic Impact Study and Mainframe Benchmark Study
Modified 10/1/2003 8:07 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Plan; Case Study
Body
REDMOND, Wash., Sept. 15, 2003 -- Now more than ever, businesses are looking for substantive data to help them quantify IT costs and determine the overall value of their IT investments in an effort to watch their bottom line. This concern has raised questions about software alternatives to Microsoft. To help address customers' questions about performance and cost when comparing Microsoft products to Linux-based offerings, and to give them third-party comparative data, Microsoft commissioned two new pieces of research.
Microsoft asked Giga Research, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Forrester Research Inc., to run a detailed, objective comparison and analysis of portal application development and deployment for .NET on Microsoft Windows and J2EE on Linux for medium and large-sized companies. Microsoft also commissioned an independent third-party performance benchmark, audited by Meta Group, to compare server consolidation using Microsoft Windows Server 2003 versus a Linux-based IBM mainframe. (See links to both studies at right.)
Giga's findings indicate that, as a portal application development platform, running .NET on Windows offers substantial cost savings over Linux and the J2EE development environment -- as much as 25 to 28 percent less over a four-year period. Additionally, the IBM/Linux benchmark indicates that an Intel server running Windows Server 2003 performs significantly better -- 20 to 300 percent better -- than an IBM zSeries 900 mainframe running Linux.
PressPass spoke with Martin Taylor, Microsoft's general manager of platform strategy, about the studies and the significance of the findings for customers, and with John Rymer, vice president at Forrester Research, regarding the methodology of Forrester's cost-comparison study.
 
Title Linux vs Windows Server 2003: Giga Total Economic Impact Study and Mainframe Benchmark Study

Attachment
Title The Top Twenty Internet Security Vulnerabilities and How To Get Rid Of Them...
Modified 11/16/2003 2:36 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Architect; Plan; Maintain; Top IT Tasks
Body
A good presentation to download quickly!
 
Made by
  • UK National Infrastructure Security Co-ordination Centre (NISCC), an interdepartmental organisation set up to co-ordinate and develop existing work within Government departments and agencies and organisations in the private sector to defend against electronic attack.
    http://www.niscc.gov.uk
  • The US Department of Homeland Security
  • SANS Institute : http://www.sans.org
 
Title The Top Twenty Internet Security Vulnerabilities and How To Get Rid Of Them...
 
Attachment
Title About the FIPS 198 protocol
Modified 11/20/2003 7:40 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; WIndows XP Professional
Categories Security Services
Body
The Federal Information Processing Standards Publication Series of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is the official series of publications relating to
standards and guidelines adopted and promulgated under the provisions of Section 5131 of the Information Technology Management Reform Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-106)
and the Computer Security Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-235). These mandates have given the Secretary of Commerce and NIST important responsibilities for improving the utilization and management of computer and related telecommunications systems in the Federal government. The NIST, through its Information Technology Laboratory, provides leadership, technical guidance, and coordination of government efforts in the development of standards and guidelines in these areas.
Title About the FIPS 198 protocol

Attachment
Title ADS Training Kit Module 7: Windows Security and PKI concepts
Modified 12/10/2004 2:05 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Architect; Security Services
Body
Download this to learn more on Windows security and PKI fondamentals. This document is in French.
 
Title ADS Training Kit Module 7: Windows Security and PKI concepts
 
Attachment
Title Technology Elements of a PKI by Steve Clark Sr. Technology Specialist - Microsoft Corp.
Modified 11/21/2003 7:46 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Architect; Security Services
Body
Developing a Certificate Strategy:  People, Process and Technology Elements of a PKI
Title Technology Elements of a PKI by Steve Clark Sr. Technology Specialist - Microsoft Corp.

Attachment
Title Windows Desktop Client Security presentation (French)
Modified 11/21/2003 2:32 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Security Services
Body
A strategic PPT about good practices and technologies used to implement a more secured environnment .... (French)
 
Title Windows Desktop Client Security presentation (French)
 
Attachment
Title Windows Server 2003 Technical Overview of Management Services
Modified 12/28/2003 9:55 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Maintain; Support; Top IT Tasks; Security Services
Body
The Microsoft® Windows® Server 2003 family provides change and configuration management solutions with new and enhanced tools that lower total cost of ownership (TCO). This paper provides a technical overview of Microsoft IntelliMirror® management technologies and related management tools and services including command-line management, managing security and software restriction policies, remote installation, Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI),  user state migration, Windows Installer, and remote administration. In addition, this paper explains when you should consider other solutions such as Microsoft Systems Management Server (SMS) to meet the demands of more advanced and complex scenarios. 
Title Windows Server 2003 Technical Overview of Management Services

Attachment
Title About Hyper Threading Technology and Microsoft Licensing
Modified 12/30/2003 6:11 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server
Categories Support
Body
This article provides an overview of how the Microsoft® Windows® Server operating system works with Intel® Hyper-Threading technology. It explains the implications for performance, compatibility, and licensing.
Title About Hyper Threading Technology and Microsoft Licensing
 
Attachment
Title Microsoft Windows 2003 Security Guide
Modified 1/6/2004 3:44 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server
Categories Deploy; Maintain; Support; Security Services
Body
This guide is designed to provide you with the best information available to assess and counter security risks specific to Microsoft® Windows Server™ 2003 in your environment. The chapters in this guide provide detailed guidance on enhancing security setting configurations and features wherever possible in Windows Server 2003 to address threats identified in your environment.
 
If you are a consultant, designer, or systems engineer involved in a Windows Server 2003 environment, this guide has been designed with you in mind.
 
The guidance has been reviewed and approved by Microsoft engineering teams, consultants, support engineers, as well as customers and partners to make it:
 
Proven — Based on field experience
Authoritative — Offers the best advice available
Accurate — Technically validated and tested
Actionable — Provides the steps to success
Relevant — Addresses real – world security concerns

Working with consultants and systems engineers who have implemented Windows Server 2003, Windows® XP, and Windows® 2000 in a variety of environments has helped establish the latest best practices to secure these servers and clients.
 
All informations you can need  is provided in detail in this guide.
 
 
Connect on this link, and download each chapter!
 
Title Microsoft Windows 2003 Security Guide

Title Threats and Countermeasures Guide
Modified 1/6/2004 3:52 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; WIndows XP Professional
Categories Deploy; Maintain; Support; Security Services
Body

The purpose of this guide is to provide a reference to many of the security settings available in the current versions of the Microsoft® Windows® operating systems.

This is a companion guide for The Windows Server 2003 Security Guide, available at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=14845 and the Windows XP Security Guide available at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=14839.

The chapters of this guide are split up to reflect the major sections that appear in the group policy editing user interface.

Each chapter begins with a brief explanation of what will be covered, followed by a list of subsection headers, each one of these corresponds to a setting or group of settings. Each of these, in turn, has a brief explanation of what the countermeasure does.

While many of the settings available in group policy are documented in this guide, not all of them are. That is because many of the group policy settings are intended to help organizations manage their environments but they aren't necessary directly related to security.

This guide only examines the settings and features available in Microsoft® Windows Server 2003™ and Windows XP® that can help an organization secure their enterprises.

The information provided within this guide should help you and your organization decide which specific countermeasures need to be put in place and how to prioritize that list.

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/topics/hardsys/TCG/TCGCH00.asp


Downloads and Resources   
Download Threats and Countermeasures: Security Settings in Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP at http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=1B6ACF93-147A-4481-9346-F93A4081EEA8&displaylang=en

Download the Windows Server 2003 Security Guide at http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=8A2643C1-0685-4D89-B655-521EA6C7B4DB&displaylang=en

Download the Windows XP Security Guide at http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=2D3E25BC-F434-4CC6-A5A7-09A8A229F118&displaylang=en

Title Threats and Countermeasures Guide
 
Attachment
Title About Microsoft Live Communication Server 2003
Modified 1/21/2004 2:02 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Architect; Collaboration; Instant Messaging; Security Services
Body
Microsoft® Office Live Communications Server 2003 Standard Edition provides enterprise-ready instant messaging (IM), presence technology, and an extensible platform for connecting people, information and business processes all within a familiar, integrated user experience enabling better and faster decision making.
 
Live Communications Server 2003 also offers standards-based, managed IM with functionality that includes logging, archiving, file transfer, audio and video conferencing, and application sharing.
 
Live Communications Server supports:
  • SIP - Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
  • SIMPLE - SI for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions (SIMPLE).

All these standards ensure an extensible platform for all real-time communications like:

  • Audio and visual communication
  • Instant messaging
  • Application sharing
  • Notifications
  • SharePoint sites 
  • Microsoft Office System programs like Outlook and others
  • Remote assistance
  • File transfer
  • TLS - All server-to-server traffic can be encrypted with Transport Layer Security (TLS)
  • Clients have the option of encrypting traffic to the server by using Transport Layer Security (TLS)
  • RTP - Real-Time Transfer Protocol encryption is also supported.
  • User Authorization through Active Directory with Kerberos V5 and NTLM.
  • GPO - Group Policy Object (GPO) via Active Directory to manage bandwidth policies to set maximum limits on how much bandwidth is used in audio, video and file-transfer sessions.

For more information about implementing a centralized, secure and extensible IM solution, go on:

http://www.microsoft.com/office/system/realtime.mspx

http://www.microsoft.com/office/livecomm/prodinfo/default.mspx

 

 

Title About Microsoft Live Communication Server 2003

Attachment
Title Upgrading from Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 to Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server: A Six-Step Case Scenario
Modified 1/21/2004 7:40 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Architect; Plan; Deploy
Body

This article provides a Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server deployment case scenario for an imaginary company.

This article guides you through the following six steps of an Exchange deployment:

  1. Create a detailed deployment plan.
  2. Begin a successful deployment of Microsoft Windows 2000.
  3. Prepare Active Directory directory service and Exchange directories.
  4. Install your first Exchange 2000 server.
  5. Upgrade the information stores and other Exchange components.
  6. Switch to Exchange native mode.

The purpose of this article is to provide you with a clear picture of upgrading from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000, which you can use as a basis for your own deployment.

 

Title Upgrading from Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 to Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server: A Six-Step Case Scenario
 
Attachment
Title RFC 3279: Algorithms and Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
Modified 2/18/2004 1:01 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server
Categories Architect; Security Services
Body

Network Working Group
Request for Comments: 3279
Obsoletes: 2528
Category: Standards Track 
W. Polk - NIST
R. Housley - RSA Laboratories
L. Bassham - NIST
April 2002

Algorithms and Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

 

Table of Contents

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Algorithm Support
  • 2.1 One-Way Hash Functions
  • 2.1.1 MD2 One-Way Hash Functions
  • 2.1.2 MD5 One-Way Hash Functions
  • 2.1.3 SHA-1 One-Way Hash Functions
  • 2.2 Signature Algorithms
  • 2.2.1 RSA Signature Algorithm
  • 2.2.2 DSA Signature Algorithm
  • 2.2.3 Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm
  • 2.3 Subject Public Key Algorithms
  • 2.3.1 RSA Keys
  • 2.3.2 DSA Signature Keys
  • 2.3.3 Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange Keys
  • 2.3.4 KEA Public Keys
  • 2.3.5 ECDSA and ECDH Public Keys
  • 3 ASN.1 Module
  • 4 References
  • 5 Security Considerations
  • 6 Intellectual Property Rights
  • 7 Author Addresses

Copyright Notice - Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights reserved.

Click the link bellow to see the full RFC or connect to http://www.rfc-editor.org/ and search in the RFC database 3279

 

 

Title RFC 3279: Algorithms and Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure

Attachment
Title PPT: How Microsoft Does Patch Management Using Microsoft Systems Management Server 2003
Modified 6/1/2004 7:33 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server; WIndows XP Professional; Windows 2000 Professional
Categories Architect; Plan; Deploy; Support
Body
This 30-minute multimedia presentation, published January 2004, discusses how Microsoft IT patches its desktop and server environment using Microsoft Systems Management Server (SMS) 2003. 
 
Microsoft IT turned to SMS 2003 to manage the application deployment process, improve hardware and software asset management, and to manage the deployment of security and software updates across the enterprise.
Microsoft IT’s lessons learned and best practices for using SMS 2003 for desktop and server patch management.
This multimedia presentation is intended for enterprise technical decision makers who want to gain a better understanding of the processes and implementation of SMS 2003 for patch management. This multimedia presentation does not include a detailed discussion of the SMS 2003 feature set.
Title PPT: How Microsoft Does Patch Management Using Microsoft Systems Management Server 2003
 
Attachment
Title Windows 2003 Active Directory : Différences avec Windows 2000 Server.
Modified 6/23/2004 7:38 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server
Categories Architect; Plan; Deploy; Support; Top IT Tasks; Case Study; Security Services
Body
Ce document Microsoft  en format PDF décrit de manière détaillée toutes les différences qui existent entre Microsoft Windows Server 2003 et Microsoft Windows 2000.
Ce document est particulièrement axé sur les services d'annuaire Active Directory.
 
 
 
 
Title Windows 2003 Active Directory : Différences avec Windows 2000 Server.

Attachment
Title All tasks to deploy the Active Directory (French MPP file)
Modified 6/23/2004 10:05 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server
Categories Architect; Plan; Deploy
Body
This Microsoft Project 2003 file describes all tasks and actions required to design, plan and deploy the Active Directory Service...
 
A good starting point to begin the work...
Title All tasks to deploy the Active Directory (French MPP file)
 
Title Optimizing Size Requirements for Growth in Directory Service
Modified 8/25/2004 12:20 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Architect
Body
Please, read this MS link to learn more on Active Directory sizing.
 
 
 
Title Optimizing Size Requirements for Growth in Directory Service

Attachment
Title Discover How Siemens Manages 340,000 Desktops!
Modified 10/10/2004 11:47 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Architect; Collaboration; Plan; Case Study
Body
Today, Siemens has 417,000 people, 340,000 desktops, and 8,900 servers in 130 business units in 190 countries. A few years ago, Siemens supported its business with 1,000 domains in a highly decentralized structure.
 
It wanted a single, centralized Active Directory to streamline user management, e-mail, and collaboration. Siemens was also developing an Entitlement Architecture based on a Siemens DirX solution for its corporatewide Identity Management infrastructure.
 
Title Discover How Siemens Manages 340,000 Desktops!
 
Attachment
Title Security Screen Savers
Modified 10/25/2004 4:26 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server; WIndows XP Professional; Windows 2000 Professional
Categories Deploy; Security Services
Body
A cool screen saver for security best practices... from MS
 
 
Title Security Screen Savers

Attachment
Title Group Policy Infrastructure White Paper
Modified 11/25/2004 9:09 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server; WIndows XP Professional; Windows 2000 Professional
Categories Architect
Body
Intended for system administrators, architects, and others who need to create and manage Group Policy settings, this paper explains Group Policy infrastructure and shows how Group Policy Management Console (GPMC), a new MMC snap-in with scripting interfaces, fits into this infrastructure.
 
 
 
 
Administrators use Group Policy to specify managed configurations for groups of computers and users. Group Policy includes options for registry-based policy settings, security settings, software installation, scripts, folder redirection, Remote Installation Services, and Internet Explorer maintenance. Intended for system administrators, architects, and others who need to create and manage Group Policy settings, this paper explains Group Policy infrastructure and shows how Group Policy Management Console (GPMC), a new MMC snap-in with scripting interfaces, fits into this infrastructure. The paper includes detailed information about Group Policy processing as well as many best practices useful to the Group Policy administrator.
 
 
Title Group Policy Infrastructure White Paper
 
Title Windows Server 2003 Security Guide
Modified 3/19/2005 9:16 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Architect; Plan; Deploy; Security Services
Body
The material explains the different requirements to secure three distinct environments, as well as what each prescribed server setting addresses in terms of client dependencies. The three environments considered are called Legacy Client, Enterprise Client, and High Security.
• The Legacy Client settings are designed to work in an Active Directory domain running on Windows Server 2003 domain controllers with Windows 98, Windows NT 4.0, and later client computers and member servers.
 
• The Enterprise Client settings are designed to work in an Active Directory domain running on Windows Server 2003 domain controllers with Windows 2000, Windows XP, and later client computers and member servers.
 
• The High Security settings are also designed to work in an Active Directory domain running on Windows Server 2003 domain controllers with Windows 2000, Windows XP, and later client computers and member servers. However, the High Security settings are so restrictive that many applications may not function, performance of the servers may be noticeably slower, and managing the servers will be more challenging.
 
See full-sized image.

These levels of hardening guidance are provided for a baseline member server as well as a group of distinct server roles. The documents included as part of this guidance are discussed below.
 
To download, click this link,
 
Title Windows Server 2003 Security Guide

Title Windows 2000 Auditing and Intrusion Detection
Modified 3/25/2005 2:15 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Architect
Body
It is not sufficient to simply put secure systems in place to maintain a truly secure environment. It is a dangerous assumption that either you will not be attacked, or that your defenses will adequately protect you.
 
To maintain the security of your systems it is also necessary to actively monitor for intrusion and attack.
There are a number of reasons why monitoring and auditing for intrusion are very important.
 
These include:
• Any functional computer environment is potentially open to attack. No matter how high your level of security, there is a risk that you may be attacked.
 
• Successful attacks often follow a series of unsuccessful ones. If you do not monitor for attacks you will not detect intruders before they are successful.
 
• Once a successful attack occurs, the earlier you find out, the easier it will be to contain the damage.
 
• In order to recover from an attack, you need to know what damage has been done.
 
• Auditing and intrusion detection helps you determine who was responsible for the attack.
 
• The combination of auditing and intrusion detection helps correlate information to identify attack patterns.
 
• Regular review of security logs helps identify unknown security configuration issues, such as incorrect permissions, or lax account lockout settings.
 
• After an attack is detected, auditing can assist in determining what network resources are compromised.
 
 
Objectives
Use this module to:
• Implement auditing in your organization using best practices.
 
• Protect key log files and prevent attackers from interfering with evidence.
 
• Combine passive and active detection methods.
 
• Identify which tools and technologies need to be made available to surveillance and monitoring staff, and how they will be used in the auditing process.
 
To download the complete solution, clickk this link:
 
To access all web content, click this link:

 

 

 

Title Windows 2000 Auditing and Intrusion Detection
 
Attachment
Title Upgrading from Windows NT Server 4.0
Modified 5/8/2005 9:25 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server
Categories Architect; Plan; Deploy
Body
This document provides an overview of the upgrade process and provides information on some of the basic decisions you will make during the process—whether upgrading an existing system, or performing a new installation. This document also provides pointers to the complete set of documents, including Getting Started and the onscreen Help and Support Center that provide detailed instructions on moving from Windows NT Server 4.0 to Windows Server 2003.
Title Upgrading from Windows NT Server 4.0

Title How to control Windows Firewall Settings for Microsoft Windows XP with Service Pack 2?
Modified 5/16/2005 1:33 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; WIndows XP Professional
Categories Architect; Plan; Deploy; Security Services
Body
Although Group Policy is the recommended and easiest method to deploy Windows Firewall settings for computers running Windows XP with SP2, there are situations in which this method is not possible or not used. For example, an environment that uses Windows NT® 4.0 domains or that uses workgroups cannot use Active Directory and Group Policy to propagate Windows Firewall settings to multiple computers on an organization network.
 
Another example is an organization that uses Active Directory, but does not use Group Policy to centrally configure user or computer configuration settings.
 
For more information about deploying Windows Firewall settings in your enterprise, please, click this link:
 
 
To learn more, download this white paper! This document describes how to deploy the appropriate configuration settings for Windows Firewall on an organization network so that it is enabled and providing protection, and so that needed communications are not impaired.
 
 
 
Title How to control Windows Firewall Settings for Microsoft Windows XP with Service Pack 2?
 
Title Deploying PKI and RMS Inside Microsoft
Modified 5/30/2005 9:06 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server
Categories Architect; Plan; Deploy; Security Services
Body
Detailed discussion of how Microsoft IT installed a Public Key Infrastructure, built originally with Windows 2000 Server Certificate Services and later upgraded with Windows Server 2003, to implement a secure communications and remote authentication infrastructure. This enabled the use of S/MIME signatures and encryption, secured Web connections by using SSL or TLS, ensured the confidentiality of stored data by using EFS, ensured the confidentiality and integrity of transmitted date by using IPSec, and enabled strong network user authentication by using Smart Cards.
 
 
 
Title Deploying PKI and RMS Inside Microsoft

Title How Microsoft does "its" security
Modified 5/30/2005 9:18 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server; WIndows XP Professional
Categories Architect; Plan; Deploy; Top IT Tasks; Case Study; Security Services
Body
To secure the Microsoft corporate network, the Microsoft internal Information Technology group—called Microsoft IT—needed to implement multiple technologies and services based on cryptographic techniques.
 
On this link, you'll know how MS ITG does:
  • PKI Deployment Inside Microsoft 
  • Windows Rights Management Services Deployment at Microsoft 
  • Desktop Patch Management 
  • Improve Security at Microsoft through Deployment of Windows XP Service Pack 2 
  • Improve Security on Domain Isolation with IP Security (IPsec) 
  • Incident Response-Managing Security at Microsoft
  • Messaging Hygiene at Microsoft 
  • Microsoft Helpdesk Use of Remote Assistance in Windows XP Professional 
  • Microsoft IT Attack and Penetration Testing Team  
  • Patch Management for Servers 
  • Security Enhancements for Remote Access at Microsoft 
  • Server Security Patch Management at Microsoft
  • Smart Card Deployment at Microsoft 
  • Systems Management Server 2003: Deployment at Microsoft 
  • Desktop Patch Management at Microsoft 
  • Systems Management Server 2003: How Microsoft Does Patch Management 

All theses documents are available for download here:

 
Title How Microsoft does "its" security
 
Title MSDN Resources on Microsoft Cryptographic Service Providers
Modified 5/30/2005 9:33 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server; WIndows XP Professional
Categories Architect; Security Services
Body
A Cryptographic Service Provider (CSP) contains implementations of cryptographic standards and algorithms. At a minimum, a CSP consists of a dynamic-link library (DLL) that implements the functions in CryptoSPI (a system program interface).
 
To learn more on CSP inclued in Windows Server 2003, click this link:
 
 
Title MSDN Resources on Microsoft Cryptographic Service Providers

Title MS Cryptographic CSP types
Modified 5/31/2005 11:29 PM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server; WIndows XP Professional
Categories Architect; Security Services
Body
A starting point for the descriptions of supported algorithms:
Key Exchange : RSA
Signature  : RSA
Encryption :  RC2 / RC4 / AES 
Hashing : MD5 / SHA
 
To read all click this link:
 
  • About SHA Secure Hash Algorithm
    (SHA) A hashing algorithm that generates a message digest. SHA is used with the Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) in the Digital Signature Standard (DSS), among other places. CryptoAPI references this algorithm by the algorithm's identifier (CALG_SHA), name (SHA), and class (ALG_CLASS_HASH). There are four varieties of SHA: SHA-1, SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512. SHA-1 generates a 160-bit message digest. SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512 generate 256-bit, 384-bit, and 512-bit message digests, respectively.
  • SHA was developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and by the National Security Agency (NSA).
  • Secure Hash Standard
    A standard designed by NIST and NSA. This standard defines the Secure Hash Algorithm (SHA-1) for use with the Digital Signature Standard (DSS).
  • RC2 block encryption algorithm. Key length: 40 to 88 bits 
  • RC4 stream encryption algorithm. Key length: 40 to 88 bits
Title MS Cryptographic CSP types
 
Title About Cryptographic Key types and sizes
Modified 5/31/2005 7:42 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server; WIndows XP Professional
Categories Architect; Security Services
Body
Cryptographic keys are central to cryptographic operations. They must be kept secret because whoever possesses a given key has access to any data that the key is associated with.
 
For example, if a key is used to encrypt a file, anyone with a copy of that key can decrypt the file. Furthermore, anyone possessing a key used to sign messages can forge that message's signature.

There are two types of cryptographic keys:
 
Session Keys and Public/Private Key Pairs
  • Public/Private Key Pairs

Public/private key pairs are used for asymmetric encryption. Asymmetric encryption is used mainly to encrypt and decrypt session keys and digital signatures. Asymmetric encryption uses public key encryption algorithms.


Public key algorithms use two different keys: a public key and a private key. The private key member of the pair must be kept private and secure. The public key, however, can be distributed to anyone who requests it. The public key of a key pair is often distributed by means of a digital certificate. When one key of a key pair is used to encrypt a message, the other key from that pair is required to decrypt the message. Thus if user A's public key is used to encrypt data, only user A (or someone who has access to user A's private key) can decrypt the data. If user A's private key is used to encrypt a piece of data, only user A's public key will decrypt the data, thus indicating that user A (or someone with access to user A's private key) did the encryption.
 
If the private key is used to sign a message, the public key from that pair must be used to validate the signature. For example, if Alice wants to send someone a digitally signed message, she would sign the message with her private key, and the other person could verify her signature by using her public key. Because presumably only Alice has access to her private key, the fact that the signature can be verified with Alice's public key indicates that Alice created the signature.
 
Unfortunately, public key algorithms are very slow, roughly 1,000 times slower than symmetric algorithms. It is impractical to use them to encrypt large amounts of data. In practice, public key algorithms are used to encrypt session keys.
 
Symmetric algorithms are used for encryption/decryption of most data.
 
Similarly, because signing a message in effect encrypts the message, it is not practical to use public key signature algorithms to sign large messages. Instead, a fixed-length hash is made of the message and the hash value is signed. For more details, see Hashes and Digital Signatures.
 
Each user generally has two public/private key pairs. One key pair is used to encrypt session keys and the other to create digital signatures. These are known as the key exchange key pair and the signature key pair, respectively.
 
Note that although key containers created by most cryptographic service providers (CSPs) contain two key pairs, this is not required. Some CSPs do not store any key pairs while other CSPs store more than two pairs.
 
All keys in CryptoAPI are stored within CSPs. CSPs are also responsible for creating the keys, destroying them, and using them to perform a variety of cryptographic operations.
 
Exporting keys out of the CSP so that they can be sent to other users is discussed in Cryptographic Key Storage and Exchange.

 
To read all concerning session keys, click this link!
 
 
The default CSP and default key length may change between operating system versions. It is important that both the encryption and decryption use the same CSP and that the key length be explicitly set using the dwFlags parameter to ensure interoperability on different operating system platforms.
In particular, the default RSA Full Cryptographic Service Provider is the Microsoft RSA Strong Cryptographic Provider. The default DSS Signature Diffie Hellman Cryptographic Service Provider is the Microsoft Enhanced DSS Diffie Hellman Cryptographic Provider. Each of these CSPs has a default 128-bit symmetric key length for RC2 and RC4 and a 1,024-bit default key length for public key algorithms.
 
The following table lists minimum, default, and maximum signature and exchange key lengths beginning with Windows XP.
Key type and provider Minimum length Default length Maximum length
RSA Base Provider
Signature and ExchangeKeys 384 512 16,384
RSA Strong and Enhanced Providers
Signature and Exchange Keys 384 1,024 16,384
DSS Base Providers
Signature Keys 512 1,024 1,024
DSS Base Providers
Exchange Keys Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
DSS/DH Base Providers
Signature Keys 512 1,024 1,024
DSS/DH Base Providers
Exchange Keys 512 512 1,024
DSS/DH Enhanced Providers
Signature Keys 512 1,024 1,024
DSS/DH Enhanced Providers
Exchange Keys 512 1,024 4,096
 
The following table lists minimum, default, and maximum signature and exchange key lengths through Windows 2000.
Key type and provider Minimum length Default length Maximum length
RSA Base and Strong Providers
Signature Keys 384 512 16,384
RSA Base Provider
Exchange Keys 384 512 1,024
RSA Strong Provider
Exchange Keys 384 512 16,384
RSA Enhanced Provider
Signature and Exchange Keys 384 1,024 16,384
 
 
Title About Cryptographic Key types and sizes

Attachment
Title Concepts: Windows and Security Services
Modified 6/3/2005 7:18 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server
Categories Architect; Security Services
Body
A PPT file (in french) to understand major concepts on WIndows security services.
 
 
Title Concepts: Windows and Security Services
 
Title Windows Server 2003 TechCenter Home / Security Services : Certificate Autoenrollment in Windows Server 2003
Modified 6/2/2005 12:45 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server
Categories Architect; Security Services
Body
Microsoft Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition introduces the capability to automatically enroll users and computers for certificatesincluding smart cardbased certificates.
 
Using the autoenrollment feature, organizations can manage the certificate lifecycle for users, which includes:
• Certificate renewal
 
• Superseding of certificates
 
• Multiple signature requirements
 
Certificate autoenrollment is based on the combination of Group Policy settings and version 2 certificate templates. This combination allows the Windows XP Professional or Windows Server 2003 client to enroll users when they log on to their domain, or a machine when it boots, and keeps them periodically updated between these events.
Automatic enrollment of user certificates provides a quick and simple way to issue certificates to users and to enable public key infrastructure (PKI) applications, such as smart card logon, Encrypting File System (EFS), Secure Sockets Layer (SSL), Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension (S/MIME), and others, within an Active Directory directory service environment.
 
User autoenrollment minimizes the high cost of normal PKI deployments and reduces the total cost of ownership (TCO) for a PKI implementation when Windows XP Professional clients are configured to use Active Directory.
 
To read the full story, click here!
 
Title Windows Server 2003 TechCenter Home / Security Services : Certificate Autoenrollment in Windows Server 2003

Title How to troubleshoot Exchange Server 2003 Message Security?
Modified 6/2/2005 1:09 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003
Categories Architect; Security Services
Body
To resolve all certificates problems with encryption and signatures with Outlook, Exchange and Certificate Services, click this link:
 
 
Title How to troubleshoot Exchange Server 2003 Message Security?
 
Title Implementing and Administering Certificate Templates in Windows Server 2003
Modified 6/3/2005 6:56 AM
OS concerned Windows Server 2003; Windows 2000 Server; WIndows XP Professional
Categories Architect; Security Services
Body
Windows 2000 introduced the concept of using certificate templates to define the format and content of a certificate. Certificate templates are used by Windows 2000 Enterprise CAs to define what certificates can be issued by the Windows 2000 Enterprise CAs. Associated with the certificate template is a discretionary access control list (DACL) that defines which security principals have permissions to read, enroll, and configure the certificate template. Enterprise CAs are integrated into Active Directory. The certificate templates and the DACLs of the certificate template objects are defined in Active Directory with a forest-wide validity. If more than one Enterprise CA is running in the Windows forest, permission changes would have an impact on all Enterprise CAs.
The certificate templates used by Windows 2000 Enterprise CAs are known as version 1 certificate templates. Windows 2000 shipped with a number of predefined version 1 certificate templates, but modification of these default certificate templates is not allowed. The only modification that is enabled is the changing of permissions to allow enrollment of the certificate template. The version 1 certificate templates are created by default when an Enterprise CA is installed.
Windows Server 2003 extends certificate templates by introducing version 2 templates. Version 2 templates allow customization of most settings in the template. Several preconfigured version 2 templates are supplied in the default configuration and more can be added as necessary. This allows complete configuration flexibility for administrators. Alternatively, a version 1 certificate template can be duplicated, resulting in a version 2 certificate template that can be modified and secured separately.
Note: Similar to Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003 supports only